- Thinking Machines Labโs Andrew Tulloch is the latest engineer to reject Mark Zuckerberg as Meta scrambles to pull ahead in the AI race.
- The University of Sydney alum and Perth native was reportedly offered a compensation package worth as much as US$1.5 billion over โat least six yearsโ to jump ship.
- Though as alluded to above, Tulloch isnโt the only star player Zuckerberg and his tech empire have sought to poachโฆ
If you needed any further confirmation that artificial intelligence (AI) is the future, just look at who Mark Zuckerberg is targeting for acquisition.
Over the past few months, headlines have reported that the founder & CEO of Meta โ parent company behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp โ has been offering a kingโs ransom for senior engineers to join his newly-founded superintelligence lab.
To the point where US$100 million per year contracts have become the norm.
Zuckerberg even attempted to acquire fledgling startups like the US$12 billion Thinking Machines Lab helmed by OpenAIโs former chief technology officer, Mira Murati. But when the latter respectfully declined, Meta responded by โlaunching a full-scale raid.โ
โIn the following weeks, [Zuckerberg] approached more than a dozen of Muratiโs roughly 50 employees to sound them out about jumping ship. His chief target: Andrew Tulloch, a leading researcher and co-founder at the startup,โ reveals Berber Jin and Keach Hagey of The Wall Street Journal.
Here he is: the man who turned down a $1B offer over 4yrs from Meta. pic.twitter.com/fLqVxZFWFz
โ Deedy (@deedydas) August 2, 2025
RELATED: From Mining Heiresses To Tech Titans, Here Are Australiaโs Richest People Right Now
As per his LinkedIn profile, this wasnโt the first time that Tulloch โ the Perth-born University of Sydney graduate, and University of Cambridge alum โ had crossed paths with Mark Zuckerberg.
The homegrown AI boffin was previously employed by Meta as a โDistinguished Engineerโ in its nascent AI arm following a brief stint at Goldman Sachs as a strategist. After just under 12 years, he made the leap to Sam Altmanโs OpenAI in 2024, before the exodus with Murati a year later.
Jin and Hagey continue: โTo peel him off, Zuckerberg dangled a billion-dollar package that could, with top bonuses and extraordinary stock performance, have been worth as much as $1.5 billion over at least six years, according to people familiar with the matterโฆ Meta spokesman Andy Stone called the description of the offer โinaccurate and ridiculousโ and said that any compensation package is predicated on a stock rising.โ
In any case, neither Andrew Tulloch nor any of his colleagues were enticed by the prospect of a Kylian Mbappe-calibre payday. And while nobody from Thinking Machines Lab has publicly clarified why, The Wall Street Journal has provided some parallel insight regarding the matter:
โThe OpenAI researchers who have so far rebuffed Metaโs advances chose to remain because they believed OpenAI was the closest to reaching artificial general intelligence, wanted to work at a smaller company, and were wary of having the fruits of their labours go toward a product that was primarily driven by advertising, according to people familiar with the matter.โ
RELATED: 24 Rules To Help You Get S**t Done (According To A Tech Billionaire)
Fair play. Couldnโt be us. Or the 10 out of 100 OpenAI employees who actually declared for team Meta (including Chinese researcher Shengjia Zhao, who now leads its superintelligence operation).
But before you quit your gig to knock on Mark Zuckerbergโs door with that CV in hand, do note that the company obviously isnโt shelling out nine-to-ten figures for any old schlub who fancies themselves a ChatGPT whisperer. This is an arena for professional commodities only.
โLook, the marketโs hot. Itโs not that hot. Okay?โ said Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth.
โWe have a small number of leadership roles that weโre hiring for, and those people do command a premium.โ
Translation: anything less than an Andrew Tulloch can jog on. 99.95 ATAR, Christ Church Grammar vice captaincy, and all.
